Please note that this is a "text-based", course. The materials are downloaded by the user, read and absorbed, and then the user takes the review and final assessment online at Illumeo as usual, where, once passed, all CPE is tracked and kept for long-term reference.
This 4-hour course is designed to meet the 4-hour Ethics CPE requirement for Texas CPAs. It focuses on case studies applying the spirit and intent of the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy Rules of Professional Conduct and emphasizes ethical judgment and the ethical standards of the profession.
Review Questions and Final Exam are completed under section "Review and Test".
Learning Objectives
- Discover and define ethics from an overall and professional perspective.
- Explore and describe the ethical standards contained in the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy Rules of Professional Conduct.
119 Reviews (454 ratings)
Prerequisites
No advanced preparation or prerequisites are required for this course.
Education Provider Information
Course Questions and Answers(3 Questions)

I took this course 2 years ago, earned credit, and reported as my Texas Ethics CPE requirement. I am in a new accrual/reporting period that an ethics course is required again. Do you know if I can take this same course again, and report it as my ethics training? (I could not find specific mention in the ethics regs about retaking a course in another reporting period. I know there are other courses on the Texas "approved" list, but I have a subscription to Illumeo for which this course would be covered. Thank You.
Thank you for the question. Yes you can take the course again as we update it each year.
The course says "If the CPA and the client, or a key member of client’s management, both have a direct ownership interest in a non-client and the ownership interest to the client or client’s management is material, independence is impaired. If the CPA has an indirect ownership investment in a joint investment, then it must be material to the CPA to impair independence. "
In the case of both the CPA and the client having a direct ownership interest, why is independence only impaired if that interest is material to the client, and not the CPA? It only references an indirect ownership interest material to the CPA as causing impairment.